LIVING IN FOSTER CARE AND IN A CHILDREN’S HOME: VOICES OF CHILDREN AND THEIR CAREGIVERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15270/45-2-215Abstract
Foster care is clearly seen as the preferred option in alternate care of the vulnerable child inSouth Africa and internationally (Kiraly, 2001; Long, 2007; McKay, 2002; Morei, 2002). TheChildren’s Act 38/2005 clearly prioritizes a foster care placement over a child and youth carecentre of which a Children’s Home is a part (Section 46(1)(a) – Children’s Act 38/2005 –(http://www.acts.co.za). Given the steady decline in traditional family living due to amongstother factors HIV/AIDS, poverty and unemployment in South Africa, the dominant view offamily care being prioritized may not always be feasible. This paper provides researchedevidence of lived experiences in both alternative care placements to deepen understanding ofbest practice options for alternate care planning and management.The objectives of the research study were:• to explore children’s experiences of foster care and the Children’s Home placement.• to explore experiences and challenges of foster parents and caregivers in Children’s Homesin caring for vulnerable children.Downloads
References
BRANDON, M., SCHOFIELD, G. & TRINDER, L 1998. Social work with children.
London: MacMillan Press.
CHILDREN’S ACT 38/2005. Available: http://www.acts.co.za. [Accessed: 03/04/2007].
CHILDREN’S AMENDMENT BILL [B19-2006]. Available: http://www.info.gov.za/gazette/
bills/2006/b19-06.pdf. [Accessed: 03/04/2007].
CHILD CARE ACT 74/1983. Available: http://www.acts.co.za. [Accessed: 03/04/2007].
DEVELOPMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES. 2000.
Master Trainers Guide. Republic of South Africa.
DE VOS, M.S. 1997. The social orientation of a child in a children’s home. Social Work
Practice, 97(2):15-20.
DE VOS, A.S., STRYDOM, H., FOUCHÉ, C.B. & DELPORT, C.S.L. 2002. Research at
Grass Roots: for the social sciences and human sciences professions (2nd ed). Pretoria: Van
Schaik Publishers.
DRAFT NATIONAL FAMILY POLICY 2005. Fact sheet: processes and programmes that
enhance family life. Available: http://www.socdev.gov.za/media/2005/april/budget%20vote/
families.htm. [Accessed: 21/05/2007].
FOWLER, J. 2003. A practitioner’s tool for child protection and the assessment of parents.
London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd.
HOCHFELD, T. 2007. Missed opportunities: conservative discourses in the draft National
Family Policy of South Africa. International Social Work, 50(1):79-91.
JACOBS, M., SHUNG-KING, M. & SMITH, C. (eds) 2005. South African Child Gauge
Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.
KIRALY, M. 2001. Residential child care staff selection: choose with care. USA: Haworth
Press Inc.
KNUTSSON, K.E. 1997. Children: noble causes or worthy citizens (1st ed). England:
Ashgate Publishing Limited.
LINCOLN, Y.S. & GUBA, E.G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage
Publications.
LONG, S. 2007. Children at the Centre: a guide to supporting community groups caring
for vulnerable children: London: Save the Children.
MALUCCIO, A.N., FEIN, E. & OLMSTEAD, K.A. 1986. Permanency planning for
children-concepts and methods. London: Tavistock Publications.
McKAY, A. 1994. No love nor money: institutional child care in South Africa. Critical
Health, 46:79-82.
McKAY, P. 2002. Orphans – the case for community care: invest in families for the sake of the
children. Children First, 6(42):26-28.
MOODLEY, R. 2006. The challenges confronting social workers in meeting the objectives
of permanency planning at children’s homes, in the magisterial district of Durban.
Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal. (Submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the
degree of MA (Social Work))
MOREI, N. 2002. The right to family life: courts start to see household diversity. Children
First, 6(45):7-10.
MULLALY, R. 1993. Structural social work: ideology, theory and practice. Toronto:
McClelland and Stewart Inc.
PERUMAL, N. & KASIRAM, M. 2008. Children’s homes and foster care: challenging
dominant discourses in South African social work practice. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk,
(2):159-169.
PUNCH, F.K. 2000. Developing effective research proposals. London: Sage Publications.
SEWPAUL, V. 2005. A structural social justice approach to family policy. Social
Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 41(4):311-323.
SHEAFOR, B.W., HOREJSI, C.R. & HOREJSI, G.A. 1997. Techniques and guidelines for
social work practice (4th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
VAN NIEKERK, J. 2007. Child participation – the Challenges for child protection workers.
The International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect – Special
Report, 1:10-11.
WEB SITES (UNAUTHORED)
Unauthored, Family support services. Available: http://www.services.gov.za. [Accessed:
/05/2007]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, and with conferences.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-4.0
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Articles as a whole may not be re-published with another journal.
