OUTCOMES-BASED ASSESSMENT: NECESSARY EVIL OR TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL

Authors

  • Vivienne Bozalek University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15270/45-1-225

Abstract

Social work educational providers at higher educational institutions (HEIs) in South Africahave been obliged since 2008 to engage with the South African Qualifications Authority’s(SAQA’s) qualification of the Bachelor of Social Work (BSW), which was registered in June2003 in the National Qualifications Framework (NQF). In February 2004 the South AfricanSocial Service Professions Council (SACSSP) wrote a letter to all social work educationalproviders requesting them to benchmark their current curriculum against the new minimumstandard requirements of the BSW on a template. Furthermore, providers of social workeducation and training had to indicate how they would change their current learningprogrammes to accommodate the minimum standards, which encompass 27 exit-leveloutcomes and their associated assessment criteria. Providers had until June 2006 to complywith the requirements of the new BSW qualification and had to start implementation of thelearning programme in January 2007.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. & REED, Y. (eds) 2002. Challenges of teacher development: an investigation of

the take-up in South Africa. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

BIGGS, J. & TANG, C. 2007. Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed).

Maidenhead: Open University Press.

BOUD, D. & FALCHIKOV, N. 2007. Rethinking assessment in higher education: learning

for the longer term. London & New York: Routledge.

BOZALEK, V. 2004. Recognition, resources, responsibilities, using students’ stories of family

to renew the South African Social Work Curriculum. Available: http//igiturarchive.library.

uu.nl/dissertations/.

BRODIE, K., LELLIOT, T. & DAVIS, H. 2002. Developing learner-centred practices through

the FDE Programme. In: ADLER, J. & REED, Y. (eds) 2002. Challenges of teacher

development: an investigation of the take-up in South Africa. Pretoria: Van Schaik

Publishers.

BRYAN, C. & CLEGG, K. (eds) 2006. Innovative assessment in higher education. London

& New York: Routledge.

BUTCHER, C., DAVIES, C. & HIGHTON, M. 2006. Designing learning: from module

outline to effective teaching. London & New York: Routledge.

CARNIOL, B. 1992. Structural social work: Maurice Moreau’s challenge to social work

practice. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 3(1):1-20.

CARTER, M. 2005. A process for establishing outcomes-based assessment plans for

writing and speaking in the disciplines. Available: http://wac.colostate.edu/llad/

v6n1/carter.pdf. [Accessed: 14/02/2009].

CLIFFORD, D. 1998. Social assessment: theory and practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.

COATES, J. 1992. Ideology and education for social work practice. Journal of Progressive

Human Services, 3(2):15-30.

COMPETENCY INTERNATIONAL SA. 2003. Assessor Training Manual. Presented at

Competency Based Assessment Workshop, UWC 13-14 February 2003.

DAHLBERG, G., MOSS, P. & PENCE, A. 1999. Beyond quality in early childhood

education and care: postmodern perspectives. London: Falmer Press.

DRISCOLL, A. & WOOD, S. 2007. Outcomes-based assessment for learner-centered

education: a faculty introduction. Sterling: Stylus.

FOOK, J. 1993. Radical casework: a theory of practice. New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.

GIBBS, G. 2006. How assessment frames student learning. In: BRYAN, C. & CLEGG, K.

(eds) Innovative assessment in higher education. London & New York: Routledge.

GLOBAL STANDARDS DOCUMENT. 2004. Available: http://www.ifsw.org/en/ p38000255

.html.

GRAYBEAL, C. 2001. Strengths-based social work assessment: transforming the dominant

paradigm. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 82(3):233-242.

LOMBARD, A., GROBBELAAR, M. & PRUIS, S. 2003. Standards for social work

qualifications in South Africa. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 39(1):1-17.

NAICKER, S.M. 2000. From Apartheid education to inclusive education: the challenges of

transformation. Unpublished Paper presented at the International Education Summit for a

Democratic Society, Wayne State University, Michigan USA, June 26-28.

NUSSBAUM, M.C. 1995. Human capabilities, female human beings. In: NUSSBAUM, M. &

GLOVER, J. (eds) Women, culture and development. A study of human capabilities.

Oxford: Clarendon Press.

SEN, A. 1995. Gender inequality and theories of justice. In: NUSSBAUM, M. & GLOVER, J.

(eds) Women, culture and development. A study of human capabilities. Oxford: Clarendon

Press.

SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY. 2003. Qualification: Bachelor of

Social Work Government Gazette Vol. 452 No. 24362 of 7 February 2003. Available:

http://www.saqa.org.za/nsb/sgestds/assessor2.html.

STEVENS, D. & LEVI, A. 2005. Introduction to rubrics: an assessment tool to save grading

time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling Virginia: Stylus.

THOMPSON, N. 1993. Anti-discriminatory practice. London: MacMillan.

VYGOTSKY, L.S. 1962. Thought and language (trans. E.H. Vakar). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT

Press.

VYGOTSKY, L.S. 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological

processes (trans. V. John-Steiner, M. Cole, S. Scribner & E. Souberman). Cambridge, Mass.:

Harvard University Press.

YOUNG, I.M. 1994. Punishment, treatment, empowerment: three approaches to policy for

pregnant addicts. Feminist Studies, 20(1):33-57.

Published

2014-06-19

How to Cite

Bozalek, V. (2014). OUTCOMES-BASED ASSESSMENT: NECESSARY EVIL OR TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.15270/45-1-225

Issue

Section

Articles