’N STERKTEPERSPEKTIEF OP BEMAGTIGENDE MAATSKAPLIKE GROEPWERK MET ALKOHOLAFHANKLIKE BEJAARDES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15270/43-1-292Abstract
In hierdie artikel word daar by die kenmerke van die sterkteperspektief asook die houdings en persepsies van maatskaplike werkers teenoor dié perspektief stilgestaan. In die teks word die agtergrond van die sterkteperspektief, die sterktes van alkoholafhanklike bejaardes, die rol van dié perspektief in geregistreerde behandelingsentra in Suid-Afrika asook die voor- en nadele van dié perspektief onder meer toegelig. Die doelwitte van hierdie artikel is (a) om deur middel van literatuurstudie en empiriese ondersoek die uitdagings, sterktes en behoeftes van alkoholafhanklike bejaardes te identifiseer waarop ’n maatskaplike groepwerk-bemagtigingsprogram gebaseer kan word, en (b) vas te stel oor watter kwaliteite die sterkteperspektief beskik ten einde die alkoholafhanklike bejaarde met maatskaplike groepwerkdienste te bemagtig.Downloads
References
BABBIE, E. 2004. The practice of social research (10th ed). Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
BLUNDO, R. 2001. Learning strengths-based practice: challenging our personal and professional frames. Families in society, 82(3):296-304.
BRUN, C. & RAPP, R.C. 2001. Strengths-based case management: individuals’ perspectives on strengths and the case manager relationship. Social Work, 46(3):278-288.
CHAZIN, R., KAPLAN, S. & TERIO, S. 2000. Introducing a strengths/resiliency model in mental health organizations. In: NORMAN, E. (ed) Resiliency enhancement: putting the strengths perspective into social work practice. Chichester, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.
CLARK, M.D. 1997. Strengths-based practice: the new paradigm. Corrections Today, 59(2):110-113, Apr. Available: Academic Search Premier. [Date of access: 24 Jan. 2003].
COWGER, C.D. & SNIVELY, C.A. 2002. Assessing client strengths: individual, family and community empowerment. In: SALEEBEY, D. (ed) The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
DE JONG, P. & MILLER, S.D. 1995. How to interview for client strengths. Social Work, 40(6):729-736.
DELPORT, C.S.L. & FOUCHÉ, C.B. 2005. The place of theory and the literature review in the qualitative approach to research. In: DE VOS, A.S. (ed) Research at grass roots (3rd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik.
DE VOS, A.S. 2005a. Qualitative data analysis and interpretation. In: DE VOS, A.S. (ed) Research at grass roots (3rd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik.
DE VOS, A.S. 2005b. Combined quantitative and qualitative approach. In: DE VOS, A.S. (ed) Research at grass roots (3rd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik.
EARLY, T.J. & GLENMAYE, L.F. 2000. Valueing families: social work practice with families from a strengths perspective. Social Work, 45(2):118-130.
GRAY, M. & VAN ROOYEN, C.A.J. 2002. The strengths perspective in social work: lessons from practice. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 38(3):193-201.
GRAYBEAL, C. 2001. Strengths-based social work assessment: transforming the dominant paradigm. Families in Society, 82(2):233-242.
KISTHARDT, W.E. 2002. The strengths perspective in interpersonal helping: purpose, principles and functions. In: SALEEBEY, D. (ed) The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
KIVNICK, H.Q. & MURRAY, S.V. 2001. Life strengths interview guide: assessing elder clients’ strengths. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 34(4):7-31.
KOTZE, G.J. 2002. Die generiese basis van gevorderde maatskaplikewerk-praktyk (MWKM874). Potchefstroom: PU vir CHO. (Studiegids.)
KOTZE, G.J. 2003. Armoedegesentreerde dienslewering (MWK411). Potchefstroom: PU vir CHO. (Diktaat D9/2003.)
LEWIS, J.S. 1996. Sense of coherence and the strengths perspective with older persons. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 26(3/4):99-112.
LOMBARD, A. 1996. Developmental social welfare in South Africa: a theoretical framework. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 32(2):162-172.
McMILLEN, J.C., MORRIS, L. & SHERRADEN, M. 2004. Ending social work’s grudge match: problems versus strengths. Families in Society, 85(3):317-325.
McQUAIDE, S. & EHRENREICH, J.H. 1997. Assessing clients strengths. Families in Society, 78(2):201-212.
MEINERT, R.G., PARDECK, J.T. & MURPHY, J.W. 1998. Introduction to postmodernism, religion and the future of social work. In: MEINERT, R.G., PARDECK, J.T. & MURPHY, J.W. (eds) Postmodernism, religion and the future of social work. Binghamton, N.Y.: Haworth Pastoral Press.
MITCHELL, M. & JOLLEY, J. 2001. Research design explained (4th ed). Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.
MKHWANAZI, H.F. & TRIEGAARDT, J. 2003. Reconceptualisation of social work: a study in Johannesburg. The Social Work Practitioner-Researcher/Die Maatskaplikewerk-Navorser-Praktisyn, 15(1):48-60.
MONETTE, D.R., SULLIVAN, T.J. & DEJONG, C.R. 2005. Applied social research: A tool for the human services (6th ed). Belmont, CA.: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning.
MURPHY, J.W. & PARDECK, J.T. 1998. Renewing social work practice through a postmodern perspective. In: MEINERT, R.G., PARDECK, J.T. & MURPHY, J.W. (eds) Postmodernism, religion and the future of social work. Binghamton, N.Y.: Haworth Pastoral Press.
NORMAN, E. 2000. Introduction: the strengths perspective and resiliency enhancement. In: NORMAN, E. (ed) Resiliency enhancement: putting the strengths perspective into social work practice. Chichester, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.
ORSULIC-JERAS, S., SHEPHERD, J.B. & BRITTON, P.J. 2003. Counseling older adults with HIV/AIDS: a strengths-based model of treatment. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 25(3):233-244.
PARDECK, J.T. & MURPHY. J.W. 1993. Postmodernism and clinical practice: a critical analysis of the disease model. Psychological Reports, 72:1187-1194.
PATEL, L. & WILSON, T. 2003. A perspective on the transformation of social welfare 1994-2002. The Social Work Research-Practitioner/Die Maatskaplikewerk-Navorser-Praktisyn, 15(3):219-232.
POTGIETER, M.C. 1973. Maatskaplike sorg in Suid-Afrika. Stellenbosch: Universiteits-uitgewers en –boekhandelaars. http://socialwork.journals.ac.za/
Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk 2007:43(1)
PRAY, J.E. 1991. Respecting the uniqueness of the individual: social work practice within a reflective model. Social Work, 36(1):80-85.
RAPP, C.A. 1998. The strengths model: case management with people suffering from severe and persistent mental illness. Oxford, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
RAPP, R.C. 2002. Strengths-based case management: enhancing treatment for persons with substance abuse problems. In: SALEEBEY, D. (ed) The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
RHODES, R. & JOHNSON, A.D. 1996. Social work and substance abuse treatment: A challenge for the profession. Families in Society, 77(3):182-185.
SA kyk SOUTH AFRICA.
SALEEBEY, D. 1996. The strengths perspective in social work practice: extensions and cautions. Social Work, 41(3):296-305.
SALEEBEY, D. 2001. Practicing the strengths perspective: everyday tools and resources. Families in Society, 82(3):221-222.
SALEEBEY, D. 2002a. Introduction: power in the people. In: SALEEBEY, D. (ed) The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
SALEEBEY, D. 2002b. The strengths perspective: possiblities and problems. In: SALEEBEY, D. (ed) The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
SALEEBEY, D. 2004. Response to “Ending social work’s grudge match.” Families in Society, 85(4):588-590.
SAS INSTITUTE INC. 2002. The SAS System for Windows Release 9.1 TS Level 1MO Copyright © 2002-2005 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
SMITH, L. 2002. Respecting the cultural contact as a strength in social work intervention. (Voordrag gelewer as deel van die jaarlikse Gesamentlike Universiteite Kongres vir Maatskaplike Werk op 11 September 2002.) Potchefstroom. (Ongepubliseer.)
SOUTH AFRICA. Department of Welfare. 1997. White paper for social welfare. Government Gazette, 18166, 8 Aug.
SOUTH AFRICA. Department of Welfare. 1999. National drug master plan. Pretoria: CTP Book Printers.
STRYDOM, H. 2000. Maatskaplikewerk-navorsing (MWK 321/411). Potchefstroom: PU vir CHO. 268 p. (Diktaat.)
STRYDOM, H. 2005a. Ethical aspects of research in the social sciences and human service professions. In: DE VOS, A.S. (ed) Research at grass roots (3rd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik.
STRYDOM, H. 2005b. Sampling and sampling methods. In: DE VOS, A.S. (ed) Research at grass roots (3rd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik.
SULLIVAN, W.P. & FISHER, B.J. 1994. Intervening for success: strengths-based case management and successful aging. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 22(1/2):61-74.
VAN DYK, A.C. 2001. Welsynskunde en bestuur. (SCK101-W & WF101-E). Pretoria: Unisa. (Studiegids.)
VAN EEDEN, E.S., RYKE, E.H. & DE NECKER, I.C.M. 2000. The welfare function of the South African government before and after apartheid. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 36(1):1-24.
VAN WORMER, K. 1999. The strengths perspective: a paradigm for correctional counseling. Federal probation, 0014-9128, 63(1):1-12, Jun. Available: Academic Search Premier. [Date of access: 12 Feb. 2005].
VAN WORMER, K. & DAVIS, D.R. 2003. Addiction treatment: a strengths perspective. Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
WALLER, M.A. 2001. Resilience in ecosystemic context: evolution of the concept. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71(3):1-25.
WEICK, A. & CHAMBERLAIN, R. 2002. Putting problems in their place: further explorations in the strengths perspective. In: SALEEBEY, D. (ed) The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
WEICK, A. & SALEEBEY, D. 1998. Postmodern perspectives for social work. In: MEINERT, R.G., PARDECK, J.T. & MURPHY, J.W. (eds) Postmodernism, religion and the future of social work. Binghamton, N.Y.: Haworth Pastoral Press.
WEICK, A., RAPP, C., SULLIVAN, W.P. & KISTHARDT, W. 1989. A strengths perspective for social work practice. Social Work, 34:350-354.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, and with conferences.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-4.0
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Articles as a whole may not be re-published with another journal.
