SOCIAL WORK SUPERVISION POLICIES AND FRAMEWORKS: PLAYING NOTES OR MAKING MUSIC?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15270/49-3-34Abstract
INTRODUCTIONKadushin (1992:230-231) drew a parallel between the supervision of social workers and making music: is supervision just a random sounding of notes, serving to mask incompetence, or is it tuneful music, conducive to social workers’ best efforts? This analogy may be considered to reflect the emergence of new public management measures as an operationalisation of neoliberal ideas, with consequent changes in conditions of service delivery, control and accountability of social workers. These management mechanisms for bureaucratic standardisation in social work have resulted in, for example, the introduction of supervision policies and frameworks in various countries, such as those of the Australian Association of Social Workers (2010), British Association of Social Workers (2011), Aortearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (2012), and the supervision framework for the social work profession in South Africa (DSD & SACSSP, 2012), to name a few.Downloads
References
REFERENCES
AORTEAROA NEW ZEALAND ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS. 2012. Supervision policy. [Online] Available: www.anzasw.org.nz. [Accessed: 03/03/2013].
AUSTRALIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS. 2010. Practice standards for social workers: supervision. [Online] Available: www.aasw.asn.au. [Accessed: 03/03/2013].
BOGO, M. & McKNIGHT, K. 2005. Clinical supervision in social work: a review of the research literature. The Clinical Supervisor, 24(1/2):49-67.
BOTHA, N.J. 2002. Supervision and consultation in social work. Bloemfontein: Drufoma.
BOURN, D. & HAFFORD-LETCHFIELD, T. 2011. The role of social work professional supervision in conditions of uncertainty. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 10(9):41-55.
BRADLEY, G., ENGELBRECHT, L.K. & HÖJER, S. 2010. Supervision: a force for change? Three stories told. International Social Work, 53(6):773-790.
BRITISH ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS. 2011. UK supervision policy. [Online] Available: www.basw.co.uk. [Accessed: 03/03/2013].CARPENTER, J., PATSIOS, D., WOOD, M., PLATT, D., SHARDLOW, S., MCLAUGHLIN, H., SCHOLAR, H., HAINES, C., WONG, C. & BLEWETT, J. 2012a. Qualified Social Worker Programme: final evaluation report (2008 to 2011). [Online] Available: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/ DFE-RR229.pdf. [Accessed: 03/03/2013].
CARPENTER, J., WEBB, C., BOSTOCK, L. & COOMBER, C. 2012b. Effective supervision in social work and social care. Social Care Institute for Excellence. [Online] Available: www.scie.org.uk. [Accessed: 03/03/2013].
CLOETE, V. 2012. The features and use of mentoring as an activity in supervision of newly qualified social workers. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University. (MA Thesis)
CONNOR, M. & POKORA, J. 2007. Coaching and mentoring at work. Developing effective practice. Berkshire: Open University Press.
DSD (DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT). 2006a. Recruitment and retention strategy for social workers. Pretoria: Department of Social Development.
DSD (DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT). 2006b. Integrated service delivery model towards improved social services. Pretoria: Government Printers.
DSD (DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT). 2012. Policy on financial awards to service providers. Pretoria: Department of Social Development.
DSD & SACSSP (DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT & SOUTH AFRICAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICE PROFESSIONS). 2012. Supervision framework for the social work profession. Department of Social Development.
ENGELBRECHT, L.K. 2006. Plumbing the brain drain of South African social workers migrating to the UK: challenges for social service providers. Social Work/ Maatskaplike Werk, 42(2):101-121.
ENGELBRECHT, L.K. 2010a. Yesterday, today and tomorrow: is social work supervision in South Africa keeping up? Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 46(3):324-342.
ENGELBRECHT, L.K. 2010b. A strengths perspective on supervision of social workers: an alternative management paradigm within a social development context. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 14(1):47-58.
ENGELBRECHT, L.K. 2012. Coaching, mentoring and consultation: the same but different activities in supervision of social workers in South Africa? Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 48(3):357-368.
FOUCHÉ, C.B. 2005. Qualitative research designs. In: DE VOS, A.S. (ed) Research at grass roots. A primer for the caring professions. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
GRINNELL, R.M., UNRAU, Y.A. & WILLIAMS, M. 2005. Scientific inquiry and social work. In: GRINNELL, R.M. & UNRAU, Y.A. (eds) Social work research and evaluation. Quantitative and qualitative approaches (7th ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.HAIR, H.J. 2012. The purpose and duration of supervision, and the training and discipline of supervisors: what social workers say they need to provide effective services. British Journal of Social Work, 1-27 (doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs071)
HARE, I. 2004. Defining social work for the 21st century. The International Federation of Social Workers’ revised definition of social work. International Social Work, 3(47):406-424.
HARLOW, E. 2013. Coaching, supervision and the social work Zeitgeist. Practice: Social Work in Action, 25(1):61-70.
KADUSHIN, A. 1992. Supervision in social work (3rd ed). New York: Columbia University Press.
KADUSHIN, A. & HARKNESS, D. 2002. Supervision in social work (4th ed). New York: Columbia University Press.
LAMBLEY, S. 2010. Managers: are they really to blame for what’s happening to social work? Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 14(2):6-19.
LAWLER, J. 2007. Leadership in social work: a case of caveat emptor? British Journal of Social Work, 37:123-141. (doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch404).
LINCOLN, Y. & GUBA, E. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
MARSHALL, C. & ROSSMAN, G.B. 1999. Designing qualitative research (3rd ed). London: Sage Publications.
NOBLE, C. & IRWIN, J. 2009. Social work supervision: an exploration of the current challenges in a rapidly changing social, economic and political environment. Journal of Social Work, 9(3):345-358.
O’DONOGHUE, K. & TSUI, M.S. 2012. Towards a professional supervision culture: the development of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Social Work, 55(1):5-28.
RSA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA). 1978. Social Service Professions Act, Act 110 of 1978. Pretoria: Government Printers.
RSA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA). 2006. Children’s Act, No.38 of 2005. Government Gazette, vol. 492, 19 June. No 28944. Cape Town.
SACSSP (SOUTH AFRICAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL SERVICE PROFESSIONS). 2007. Policy guidelines for course of conduct, code of ethics and the rules for social workers. [Online] Available: http://www.sacssp.co.za/website/wp-content/uploads/ 2012/06/Code-of-Ethics.pdf. [Accessed: 03/03/2013].
SCHUTT, R.K. 2005. Sampling. In: GRINNELL, R.M. & UNRAU, Y.A. (eds) Social work research and evaluation. Quantitative and qualitative approaches (7th ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.SIEPPERT, J.D., McMURTY, S.L. & McCLELLAND, R.W. 2005. Utilizing existing statistics. In: GRINNELL, R.M. & UNRAU, Y.A. (eds) Social work research and evaluation. Quantitative and qualitative approaches (7th ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
STAKE, R. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
THOMAS, K.G., PROPP, J. & POERTNER, J. 1998. The supervisor’s role in the transfer of training. Administration in Social Work, 22(1):1-18.
TSUI, M.S. 2005. Social work supervision. Contexts and concepts. London: Sage Publications.
TSUI, M.S. & CHEUNG, F.C.H. 2004. Gone with the wind: the impacts of managerialism on human services. British Journal of Social Work, 34(3):437-442.
Prof Lambert Engelbrecht, Department of Social Work, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. http://socialwork.journals.ac.za/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, and with conferences.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-4.0
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Articles as a whole may not be re-published with another journal.
