Verantwoordbaarheid in maatskaplike sorg: 'n Konseptuele analise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15270/38-4-1438Keywords:
Accountability, democratization, autonomy, political, collegial, professional, moralAbstract
In this article, the concept of "accountability" is submitted to a philosophical conceptual analysis, pertaining, in particular, to its relevance for social work. The author argues that the concept gains a ctuality in our current situation because of the increase in violent and white-collar crime, but also because accountability is an inevitable desideratum of a process of democratization. He analyzes the concept with reference to its meaning in the close interaction between individual an community, the tension between autonomy and limitless freedom, the moral demand that acts be universalizable, and the need for a self-critical attitude. He goes on to analyze the similarities and differences between accountability and responsibility, drawing on work done by Hans Jonas on responsibility. He concludes with remarks on the instances/parties to whom social workers are accountable, and, in this connection, distinguishes between five kinds of accountability, viz. administrative, political, collegial, professional and moral.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2002 Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, and with conferences.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-4.0
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Articles as a whole may not be re-published with another journal.