GENDER, RACE AND STRESS AMONGST WOMEN IN MANAGEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15270/46-2-176Abstract
For decades a patriarchal system precluded women from having a legal or political identity, andthe legislation and attitudes supporting a patriarchal society provided the model for slavery. By
the middle of the 20th century the emphasis had shifted from the oppression of women to
establishing social and economic equality in the work and family sphere, and the women’s
movement that sprung up during the 1960s began to argue that women were oppressed by
patriarchal structures. Theories to explain how gender and racial inequalities in management
have their roots in ideologies based on gender and racial differences, and feminist theoretical
concepts of patriarchy challenge these inequalities. They do this by challenging concepts of
gender, race, the family and the unequal division of labour underpinned by a theory of
patriarchy that has come to reveal how it operates to subordinate women and privilege men,
often at women’s expense. Thus patriarchy operates to achieve and maintain the gender and
racial inequalities essential for the subordination of women. Another factor that impedes female
managers’ access to top-level jobs is women’s own career strategies and ambivalent attitude
towards a “masculine type” career orientation characterised by competition over power. This
ambivalent attitude can be attributed to the tensions felt by female managers endeavouring to
maintain a balance between professional and family responsibility.
Downloads
References
BEATY, D.T. 1996. Eurocentric or Afrocentric? Business Day: Mastering Management
Series, Part 2, 11/03.
DAVIDSON, M.J. 1997. The black and ethnic minority woman manager: cracking the
concrete ceiling. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
DAVIDSON, M.J. & COOPER, C.L. 1992. Shattering the glass ceiling: the woman
manager. London: Chapman.
DAVIDSON, M.J. & BURKE, R. J. (eds) 2000. Women in management: current research
issues (Vol 11). London: Sage Publications.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR 1998. Employment Equity Act No. 55 of 1998. [Online]
Available: http://www.labourgov.za. [Accessed: 30/05/2009].
HANNER, J. & STATHAM, D. 1988. Women and social work. London: MacMillan.
KANTER, R. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. In: DAVIDSON, M.J. The black and
ethnic minority woman manager: cracking the concrete ceiling. London: Paul Chapman
Publishing Ltd.
KIRCHMEYER, C. 1996. Determinants of managerial career success, firm evidence and
explanation of male/female differences. Wayne State University: Academy of Management.
MADI, P. 1995. Moving the Centre. People Dynamics, 13(3):12-16.
McDERMENT, L. 1992. Present tense, future perfect. In: THOMPSON, N., MURPHY, M. &
STRADLING, S. Dealing with stress. Hong Kong: MacMillan Press Ltd.
MORNA, C.L. 2009. In South Africa, women still are underdogs in the media. [Online]
Available: http://www.afrol.com/articles/25318. [Accessed: 30/05/2009].
PERRAULT, M.R. & IRWIN, J.K. 1996. Gender differences at work. Are men and women
really that different? Analysis and findings from a study of women and men. [Online]
Available: http://www.ateamware.com,AdvancedTeamware Inc. [Accessed: 30/07/2008].
PILLAY, J.K. 2000 Women, work and family life: a case study of Indian South Africans.
Durban: University of Durban-Westville. (PhD Dissertation)
POWELL, G.N. 2000. The glass ceiling: explaining the good and bad news. In: DAVIDSON,
M.J. & BURKE, R.J. (eds) Women in management: current research issues (Vol 11).
London: Sage Publications.
RESKIN, B. 1998. The realities of affirmative action in employment. Washington, D.C.:
American Sociological Association.
SIEGRIST, J. 1996. Adverse health effects of high effort/low reward conditions. Journal of
Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1):27-41.
SIEGRIST, J. & PETER, R. 2000. The effort-reward imbalance model. In: SCHNALL, P.L.,
BELKIC, K., LANDSBERGIS, P. & BAKER, D. (eds) State of the Art Reviews.
Occupational Medicine: The Workplace And Cardiovascular Disease, 15:83-87.
Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus, Inc.
SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN IN CORPORATE LEADERSHIP CENSUS. 2004. Census
shows women progressing in top jobs. [Online] Available: http://www.bwasa.co.za/docs.
[Accessed: 30/07/2008].
SWANEPOEL, B. 2000. South African human resource management: theory and practice.
Cape Town: Juta & Co Ltd.
VINNICOMBE, S. 2000 The position of women in management in Europe. In: DAVIDSON,
M.J. (eds) Black and ethnic minority woman manager: cracking the concrete ceiling.
London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
WILKINSON, R.G. 1996. Unhealthy societies: the afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, and with conferences.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-4.0
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Articles as a whole may not be re-published with another journal.