THE PERCEPTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL SELF OF SOCIAL WORKERS IN PRIVATE PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15270/42-3-299Abstract
Earl Babbie (1992:251) states that “…who we think we are – our self concept – and how webehave is largely a function of how others see and treat us”. He goes on to say that “…the way
others perceive us is largely conditioned by expectations they may have in advance”. This
exploratory research focuses on social workers in private practice – how they view their
professional selves, the factors that contribute to the development of their professional selves and
the factors that hinder or facilitate this development
Downloads
References
ANDERSON, H. 1997. Conversation, language and possibilities: A postmodern approach to
therapy. New York: Basic Books.
BABBIE, E. 1992. The practice of social research (6th ed). California: Wadsworth.
BLOEM, C.H.M. 2004. ’n Praktykmodel vir privaatpraktykbestuur in maatskaplike werk.
Pretoria: University of Pretoria. (Unpublished PhD Thesis)
DE VOS, A.S. (ed), STRYDOM, H., FOUCHE, C.B., POGGENPOEL, M. & SCHURINK, E.W.
Research at grass roots: A primer for the caring professions. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
DE VOS, A.S., STRYDOM, H., FOUCHE, C.B. & DELPORT, C.S.L. 2005. Research at grass
roots: For the social sciences and human service professions (3rd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik.
GROBLER, H.D., SCHENCK, C.J. & DU TOIT, A.S. 2003. Person-centred communication:
Theory and practice. Cape Town: Oxford.
EFRAN, J.S., LUKENS, R.J. & LUKENS, M.D. 1988. Constructivism: What’s in it for you?
Networker.
FREEMAN, M.L. & VALENTINE, D.P. 2004. Through the eyes of Hollywood: Images of social
workers in film. Social Work, 49(2):151-161.
GIBELMAN, M. 2004. Television and the public image of social workers: Portrayal or betrayal?
Social Work, 49(2):331-333.
HAYLEY, T. 2002. The fit between reflecting teams and a social constructionist approach.
Journal of Systemic Therapies, 21(1):20-37.
HELD, B.S. 1995. Back to reality: A critique of postmodern theory in psychotherapy. New
York: WW Norton.
HENNING, E., VAN RENSBURG, W. & SMIT, B. 2004. Finding your way in qualitative
research. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
HOFFMAN, L. 1990. Constructing realities: an art of lenses. Family Process, 29(1):1-11.
KVALE, S. (ed) 1992. Psychology and postmodernism. London: Sage.
LAYTON, E. & COLLINS, K. 2004. Advancing through retreating: self-care among helping
practitioners. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 40(4):430-444.
MALHERBE, B.R. & HENDRIKS, E. 2004. An investigation into the determinants of job
satisfaction and the improvement of quality of work life of grassroots social workers. Social
Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 40(1):25-40.
MEYER, W.F., MOORE, C. & VILJOEN, H.G. 1989. Personality theories: From Freud to
Frankl. Johannesburg: Lexicon Publishers.
MOUTON, J. & MARAIS, H.C. 1991. Basic concepts: In the methodology of the social
sciences. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
NEW DICTIONARY OF SOCIAL WORK. 1995 (rev ed). Sv “private practice”. Cape Town:
CTP.
REAL, T. 1990. The therapeutic use of self in constructionist/systemic therapy. Family Process,
:255-270.
ROGERS, C.R. 1951. Client-centred therapy. London: Constable.
ROGERS, C.R. 1978. Carl Rogers on personal powers: Inner strength and its revolutionary
impact. London: Constable.
ROWAN, J. 1998. The reality game: A guide to humanistic counselling and psychotherapy
(2nd ed). New York: Routledge.
RUBIN, A. & BABBIE, E. 1993. Research methods for social work (2nd ed). California:
Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
SCHENCK, C.J. 2003. Rural social work in South Africa: The perception and experiences of
practitioners. Unpublished report, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
THE CONCISE OXFORD DICTIONARY. 1964. Sv “professional”. Great Britain: Oxford.
UNGAR, M. 2004. Surviving as a postmodern social worker: Two ps and three rs of direct
practice. Social work, 49(3):488-492.
WATZLAWICK, P. 1984. The invented reality. New York: Norton.
WINSTON, C., STINSON, L. & STINSON, E. 2004. The public’s perception of social work: Is it
what we think it is? Social Work, 49(2):164-174.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, and with conferences.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-4.0
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Articles as a whole may not be re-published with another journal.
