“SATISFIED AND/OR DISSATISFIED?” THE EXPERIENCE-BASED PERCEPTIONS OF SOCIAL WORK STUDENT CUSTOMERS OF STUDYING AT AN OPEN AND DISTANCE-LEARNING UNIVERSITY

Authors

  • Nicky Alpaslan Department of Social Work
  • George Angelopulo Department of Communication Science, University of South Africa
  • Rinie Schenck Social Work, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15270/49-3-54

Abstract

Because of their core business, institutions of higher education should be regarded as “service industries” (Chen, 2009:77; Sander, Stevenson, King, & Coates, 2000:309). In terms of their objectives, these institutions’ primary concerns are threefold:
 to promote individuals’ academic development by way of providing in-depth knowledge and skills through teaching and learning;
 to develop new knowledge through vigorous research and the dissemination of research findings for the benefit of society;
 to render community services to society by means of consultation and engaging in community-orientated service activities (Chen, 2009:77; Maliyamokono in Higgs & Van Wyk, 2006:87).When labelling institutions of higher education as “service industries”, the consumers of services of such higher institutions can no longer only be regarded as “students” but should be viewed as “customers”. They are customers who seem to be well informed about their rights as consumers, who demand effective and quality services, who voice their concerns and dissatisfaction through formal and informal channels (i.e. in communications to University authorities as well as through public demonstrations and in the media and on social networks (Sander et al., 2000:309)). As an example, one article in the printed media comes to mind (i.e. “Unisa students march to protest high fees, service” by Tsabeng Nthite in The Pretoria News on 23 September 2006:3).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AKHTAR-DANESH, N., DEHGHAN, M., MORRISON, K.M. & FONESKA, S. 2011. Parents’ perceptions and attitudes on childhood obesity: a q-methodology study. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 23:67-75.

ALPASLAN, A.H. 2012. “Hellopeter! On: how are they doing?” The perceptions, experiences and recommendations of social work students as customers of an open and distance learning university. Unpublished inaugural lecture. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

ALPASLAN, A.H. 2010a. The coping strategies employed by Unisa’s undergraduate students to address the realities experienced with respect to their living conditions in Sunnyside, Tshwane. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 46(1):1-13.

ALPASLAN, A.H. 2010b. The realities related to the living conditions of Unisa’s undergraduate students residing in Sunnyside, Tshwane. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 46(2):144-163.

ALPASLAN, N. & LOMBARD, B. 2011. Studying to become a social worker: examining the motivations of, and challenges facing, students at an open and distance learning university. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 47(4):430-450.

ANGELOPULO, G.C. 2009. Q methodology and the measurement of subjectivity in corporate brand perception. South African Journal of Business Management, 40(3):21-33.

ANGELOPULO, G.C. [In the press]. The drivers of student enrolment and retention: a stakeholder perception analysis in higher education. Perspectives in Education.

ARTINO, A.R. 2008. Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24: 260–270.

ASANTE, O. 2008. Distance learners’ perception of learner support services. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Science, 6:65-73.

ASKELAND, G.A. & PAYNE, M. 2007. Distance education and international social work education. European Journal of Social Work, 10(2):161-174.

BABBIE, E. & MOUTON, J. 2011. The practice of social research. 11th impression. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

BANKS, A.C. & FAUL, A.C. 2007. Reduction of face-to-face contact hours in foundation research courses: impact on students’ knowledge gained and course satisfaction. Social Work Education, 780-793.

BOGDAN, R.C. & BILKEN, S.K. 1982. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods Boston: Allyn and Bacon. http://socialwork.journals.ac.za/

BOTHA, P. 2011. Obstacles and facilitative opportunities while studying social work with an open and distance learning context. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 47(4):451-462.

BUREAU OF MARKET RESEARCH. 2010. Unisa student registration and campus perception study. Pretoria: Bureau of Market Research, University of South Africa.

CALLAHAN, M & WHARF, B. 1989. Distance education in social work in Canada. The Journal of Distance Education, 4(2):63-80.

CHANG, S-H. & SMITH, R.A. 2008. Effectiveness of personal integration in a learner-centred paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4):407-426.

CHEN, S-H. 2009. A performance matrix for strategies to improve satisfaction among faculty members in higher education. Quality and Quantity, 45:75-89.

CHRISTIE, A. & KRUK, E. 1998. Choosing to become a social worker: motives, incentives, concerns and disincentives. Social Work Education, 17(1):21-33.

COLLINS, S. 2008. Open and distance learning in qualifying social work education in Britain and the USA: celebrating diversity and difference? Social Work Education, 27(4):422-439.

CRESWELL, J.W. 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

DONALEK, J.G. & SOLDWISCH, S. 2004. Demystifying nursing research: an introduction to qualitative research methods. Urologic Nursing, 24(4):354,356.

DZIOPA, F. & AHREN, K. 2011. A systematic literature review of the applications of Q-techniques and its methodology. Methodology, 7(2):39-55.

ELLINGSEN, I.T., STØRKSEN, I. & STEPHENS, P. 2010. Q methodology in social work. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(5):395-409.

GALUSHA, J.M. [Sa] Barriers to learning in distance education [Online] Available: http://infrastruction.com/barriers.htm [Accessed: 13/09/2010].

GARCÍA-ARACIL, A. 2009. European graduates’ level of satisfaction with higher education. Higher Education, 57:1-21.

GASKELL, A. 2009. Student satisfaction and retention: are they connected? Open Learning, 24(3):193-196.

HAGA, M. & HEITKAMP, T. 2000. Bringing social work education to the prairie. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2):309-324.

HIGGS, P. & VAN WYK, B. 2006. University teaching in South Africa: an African philosophical perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 133:81-90.

LAWLOR, G.M. 2008. Finding fit between personal context, learning context and work context of students to further practice excellence in social work. Pretoria: University of South Africa. (Unpublished MA Dissertation) http://socialwork.journals.ac.za/

LINTVELT, R.A. 2008. The personal contexts of undergraduate students in social work at Unisa. Pretoria: University of South Africa. (Unpublished Dissertation)

McBRIEN, B. 2008. Evidence-based care: enhancing the rigour of a qualitative study. British Journal of Nursing, 17(20):1286-1289.

McFALL, J.P. & FREDDOLINO, P.P. 2000. Quality and comparability in distance field education: lessons learned from comparing three program sites. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2):293-307.

McPHAIL, B.A. 2004. Setting the record straight: social work is not a female orientated profession. Social Work, 49(2):323-326.

NEUMAN, W.L. 1997. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Allyn & Bacon.

NTHITE, T. 2006. Unisa students march to protest high fees, service. The Pretoria News, 23 September.

OJO, D.O. & OLAKULEHIN, F.K. 2006. Attitudes and perceptions of students to open and distance learning in Nigeria. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1):1-10.

OLIARO, L & TROTTER, C. 2010. A comparison of on-campus and off-campus (or distance) social work education. Australian Social Work, 63(3):329-344.

PEASE, B. 2011. Men in social work: challenging or reproducing an unequal gender regime? Journal of Women and Social Work, 26(4):406-418.

PETIT DIT DARIEL, O., WHARRAD, H. & WINDLE, R. 2010. Developing Q-methodology to explore staff views toward the use of technology in nurse education. Nurse Researcher, 18(1):58-71.

POTTS, M.K. & HAGAN, C.B. 2000. Going the distance: using systems theory to design, implement, and evaluate a distance education programme. Journal for Social Work Education, 36(1):131-145.

SAHIN, I. & SHELLEY, M. 2008. Considering students’ perceptions: the distance education student satisfaction model. Educational Technology and Society, 11(3):216-223.

SANDER, P., STEVENSON, K., KING, M. & COATES, D. 2000. University students’ expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3):309-324.

SCHENCK, R. 2009. The socio-economic realities of the social work students of the University of South Africa. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 45(3):299-313.

SHENTON, A.K. 2004. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22:63-75.

SHINEBOURNE, P. & ADAMS, M. 2007. Q-methodology as a phenomenological research method. Existential Analysis, 18(1):103-116.

http://socialwork.journals.ac.za/

TESSEMA, M.T., READY, K. & YU, W-CW. 2012. Factors affecting colleague students’ satisfaction with major curriculum: evidence from nine years of data. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(2):34-44.

TRICKER, T., RANGECROFT, M. & LONG, P. 2005. Bridging the gap: an alternative tool for course evaluation. Open Learning, 20(2):185-192.

UNISA HEMIS FIGURES FOR 2011. Retrieved from Unisa Information and Analysis Portal. [Online] Available: http://heda.unisa.ac.za/heda/fsMain.htm. [Accessed: 08/05/2012].

UNISA INTRANET. 2012. myUnisa: Join myUnisa. [Online] Available: https://my.unisa.ac.za/potral/site/!gateway/page/98326718-3ae9-41af-a28d-4931dcf42. (Accessed: 01/06/2012).

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA. 2008. Self-evaluation portfolio for the HEQC institutional audit. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

WADE, B.L. 2009. Unisa social work students’ experiences of trauma: an exploratory study from a person-centred perspective. Pretoria: University of South Africa. (Unpublished Thesis)

WALKER, E.C. & KELLY, E. 2007. Online instruction: student satisfaction, kudos and pet peeves. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4):309-319.

WANG, X. & YANG, Z. 2010. The effect of brand credibility on consumers’ brand purchase intention in emerging economies: the moderating role of brand awareness and brand image. Journal of Global Marketing, 23:177-188.

YORK, R.O. 2008. Comparing three modes of instruction in a graduate social work programme. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(

Downloads

Published

2014-05-26

How to Cite

Alpaslan, N., Angelopulo, G., & Schenck, R. (2014). “SATISFIED AND/OR DISSATISFIED?” THE EXPERIENCE-BASED PERCEPTIONS OF SOCIAL WORK STUDENT CUSTOMERS OF STUDYING AT AN OPEN AND DISTANCE-LEARNING UNIVERSITY. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.15270/49-3-54

Issue

Section

Articles