IMPLEMENTING A “BLENDED LEARNING APPROACH” IN A SOCIAL WORK COURSE: THE PERCEPTIONS OF FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS AT A SOUTH AFRICAN UNIVERSITY

Authors

  • Roshini Pillay Department of Social Work, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Priscilla Gerrard Department of Social Work, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15270/47-4-118

Abstract

Deep learning is an essential strategy that enables students to extract meaning and understanding from course material and experiences (Warburton, 2003). However, inculcating deep learning may prove challenging for facilitators in higher education in the South African context. Challenges usually arise because first-year students have to manage the difficult transition from high school to university. The difficulties of this transition are exacerbated by the fact that many students come from disadvantaged backgrounds characterised by an unevenly resourced, and sometimes dysfunctional, schooling system (Collins & Van Breda, 2010; Leibowitz, 2010; Ross, 2010:461). Research by Muthivhi and Broom (2008) also reveals that, while the modes of teaching and learning employed by teachers in South Africa are inspired by the new curriculum framework and seem to meet the objectives of outcome-based education (OBE), in reality these modes fail to instil deep learning in learners

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BABBIE, E. 2010. The practice of social research. Belmont, USA: Wadsworth.

BELLEFEUILLE, G.L. 2006. Rethinking reflective practice education in social work education: a blended constructivist and objectivist instructional design strategy for web-based child welfare practice course. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(1):85-103.

BERSIN & ASSOCIATES. 2003. Blended learning: what works? [Online] Available: http:// www.e-learningguru.com/wpapers/blended_bersin.doc [Accessed: 24/06/2010].BLOOM, B. 1956. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning. [Online] Available: http://www.teacherstoolbox.co.uk/T_Bloom.html#. [Accessed: 07/12/2009].

BOZALEK, V. & MATTHEWS, L. 2009. E-learning: a cross-institutional forum for sharing socio-cultural influences on personal and professional identity. International Social Work, 52(2):235-246.

BUZZETTO-MORE, N. 2008. Student perceptions of various e-learning components. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 4:113-121.

COLLINS, K.J. & VAN BREDA, A. 2010. Academic support for first-year social work students in South Africa. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 46(1):14-25.

COLLINS, K.J., PRETORIUS, B,. SMITH, P. & VAN BREDA, A. 2009. Teaching and learning experiences of first-year social work students in South Africa. Report for the Association of South African Social Work Educational Institutions. Bellville, South Africa.

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY. 2010. Writing@CSU. [Online] Available: http:// writing.colostate.edu/guides/research/index.cf. [Accessed: 23/10/2010].

DALGAARD, C. 2006. Social software: e-learning beyond learning management systems. [Online] Available: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib./2006/Christian_Dalgaard.htm. [Accessed:13/10/10].

DE VOS, A.S., STRYDOM, H., FOUCHÉ, C.B. & DELPORT, C.S.L. 2005. Research at grassroots – for the social sciences and human service professions (3rd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

DE VOS, A.S., STRYDOM, H., FOUCHÉ, C.B. & DELPORT, C.S.L. 2002. Research at grassroots – for the social sciences and human service professions (2nd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

DZIUBAN, C.D., HARTMAN, J.L. & MOSKAL, P.D. 2004. Blended learning. Research Bulletin, (7):1-12.

GARRISON, D.R. & VAUGHAN, N.D. 2008. Blended learning in Higher Education: framework, principles and guidelines. United States of America: John Wiley Sons Inc. [Online] Available: http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0787987700/ ref= sib_dp_ptu#reader-link [Accessed: 22/11/2010].

HAMANN, K., POLLOCK, P. & WILSON, B. 2010. Comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class discussions. APSA 2010 Teaching & Learning Conference Paper. [Online] Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1544620##. [Accessed: 22/11/2010].

KEATS, D. 2009a. e-learning strategy and tactics. Draft for public comment, Johannesburg.

KEATS, D. 2009b. Challenges for quality assurance in an education 3.0 world. PowerPoint Slides. [Online] Available: http://www.unesco.org/education/ hed/quality/keats.pdf [Accessed: 25/10/2010].

KILFOIL, W.R. 2008. A model for learning development. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(5):1019-1028.eaching and learning as critical engagement: a perspective from the “South”. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2). [Online] Available: https://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsot [Accessed: 15/10/2010].

MITCHELL, A. & HONORE, S. 2007. Criteria for successful blended learning. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(3):153-149.

MUTHIVHI, E. & BROOM, Y. 2008. Continuities across schooling transition: a case of classroom: practices among teachers in Venda, South Africa. Journal of Educational Studies, 7(1):98-121. [Online] Available: http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/educate/download/jes08. pdf [Accessed: 05/05/2011].

MULLER, C. 2010. KEWL – an open source learning management system: a practitioner's analysis of an e-learning system at WITS. Unpublished.

ROHLEDER, P., SWARTZ, L., BOZALEK, V., CAROLISSEN, R. & LEIBOWITZ, B. 2008. Community, self and identity: participatory action research and the creation of a virtual community across two South African universities. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2):131-143.

ROSS, E. 2010. Selection tests and social justice: a profile of applicants seeking admission to the social work undergraduate degree at a South African university. Social Work Education, 29(5):459-474.

ROWE, M. 2009. Knowledge and attitudes regarding the use of social software in a physiotherapy department. JCHS, 4(1):1-6.

RUBIN, A. & BABBIE, E. 2010. Essential research methods for social work (2nd ed). California: Belmont.

SAVOY, A., PROCTOR, R. & SALVENDY, G. 2009. Information retention from PowerPoint™ and traditional lectures. Computers & Education, 52(4):858-867.

SIEMENS, G. 2005. Connectivism: learning as network-creation. [Online] Available: http://www.astd.org/LC/2005/1105_siemens.htm [Accessed: 22/10/2010].

SIEMENS, G. 2010. ERN-mobiles, Meeker report, facebook and activity streams. [Online] Available: https://mail.google.com/mail/?hl=en&shva=1#inbox/12c58953e00b0101 [Accessed: 22/11/2010].

STACEY, E. & GERBIC, P. 2008. Success factors for blended learning. Proceedings ascilite Melbourne: Concise Paper. [Online] Available: www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne 08/procs/stacey.pdf [Accessed: 24/10/2010].

STOLTENKAMP, J. & KASUTO, O.A. 2009. e-learning change management and communication strategies within a HEI in a developing country: institutional organisational cultural change at the University of the Western Cape. Educ Inf Technol, 1-14.

TERRE BLANCHE, M., DURRHEIM, K. & PAINTER, D. 2006. Research in practice: applied methods for the social sciences. Cape Town: University of the Cape Town Press.

TUFTE, E. 2003. PowerPoint is evil. [Online] Available: http://www.wired.com/wired/ archive/11.09/ppt2.html [Accessed: 22/11/2010].

UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND. 2010. The teaching and learning plan 2010 to 2014. Unpublished document.

WARBURTON, K. 2003. Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, (4)1:44-56. [Online] Available: http://www. emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=839800&show=abstract [Accessed: 06/05/2011].

WENGER, E. 1998. Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-12

How to Cite

Pillay, R., & Gerrard, P. (2014). IMPLEMENTING A “BLENDED LEARNING APPROACH” IN A SOCIAL WORK COURSE: THE PERCEPTIONS OF FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS AT A SOUTH AFRICAN UNIVERSITY. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.15270/47-4-118

Issue

Section

Articles