THE INFLUENCE OF FAMILY DYNAMICS ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF WORKING MOTHERS IN A MOTOR COMPANY IN SOUTH AFRICA

Authors

  • Liesl Riekert Department of Social Work and Criminology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
  • Florinda Taute Department of Social Work and Criminology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15270/45-4-192

Abstract

Since the inception of a non-racial, non-sexist democracy in South Africa in 1994, it is not
surprising to find many mothers have entered various professional fields and occupations. “The
influx of women into the workforce, the economic necessity of two-income families, the
increase in single-parent families, child care and elder care availability and affordability, and
increased time pressure have all contributed to work and family concerns” (Gebeke, 1993:1).
Unfortunately many families and businesses have neglected to adapt to these changes. The
women-in-business debate, however, has changed because so much has changed socially over
the last 15 years (Bendeman, 2007). The increased pressure that employers place on employees
to meet the needs of their customers and run a profitable business needs to be addressed, as
employers, according to Blanchard (2000), need to put effective structures and systems in place
for people to want to perform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AMBROSINO, R., HEFFERNAN, J., SHUTTLESWORTH, G. & AMBROSINO, R. 2005.

Social work and social welfare an introduction (5th ed). Australia: Thomson, Brooks/Cole.

BENDEMAN, H. 2007. Beating the drums on the gender bandwagon. HR Future, Human

Strategy for Business, 07:34-36.

BLANCHARD, K. 2000. Talent and passion. Teaming up for the year 2000. Management

Today, 16(1):10-13.

CAMPBELL, D.J. 1994. The effects of family responsibilities on the work commitment and

job performance of women. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology,

(4):1-15.

COONTZ, S. & PARSON, M. 1997. Complicating the contested terrain of work/family

intersections. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 22(2):440-452.

COOPER, C.L. & LEWIS, S. 1998. Balancing your career, family and life. London: Kogan

Page.

DU BRIN, A.J. 1996. Human relations for career and personal success. New Jersey:

Prentice Hall.

ELMAN, C.B. 2003. Juggling career and kids. Women in Business, 55(3):3.

EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT, 1988 (Act 55 of 1998). Government Gazette, No. 19370.

Pretoria: Government Printers.

ERDWINS, C.J., BUFFARDI, L.C., CASPER, W.J. & O’BRIEN, A.S. 2001. The relationship

of women’s role strain to social support, role satisfaction and self-efficiency. Family

Relations, 50:230-238.

FERREIRA, A. 2000. A new competitive landscape. Strategic challenges for the 21st century.

Management Today, 16(1):4-7.

GEBEKE, D. 1993. Family-supportive workplace environments: the employer’s role.

NDSU Extension Service. Available: http://www.extnodak.edu [Accessed: 15/10/2003].

HEAP, J. 1992. Productivity management. New York: Cassell Educational Ltd.

HLAPOLOSA, S. 2000. Organisation development. Management Today, 16(1):14-21.

HODGETTS, R.M. 1992. Modern human relations at work. Orlando: The Dryden Press.

HOSKING, A. 2007. Listen to your children. HR Future, Human Strategy for Business,

:55-56.

HUNTS, H. & MAROTZ-BADEN, R. 2003. Family systems theory: a new look at an old

friend. Consumer Interests Annual, 49(3).

JEX, S.M. 1999. Time management as a moderator of relations between stressors and

employee strain. Work and Stress, 13(2):182-191.

KASSELMAN, J.P.H. 2000. Loopbaanontwikkeling in verhouding tot bedryfsmaatskaplikewerk:

‘n teoretiese fundering. [S.n.]

KATZ, M. 2003. The business mother in today’s workplace. Women in Business, 55(3).

KURZMAN, P.A. 2008. Occupational social work. The Encyclopedia of Social Work,

(3):311-319.

MAJOR STUDY OF WOMEN AT WORK LINKS JOB STRESS WITH POOR, FAILING

HEALTH. 2000. New Therapist, July/August:7.

MICHAELS, B. & McCARTY, E. 1993. Family ties and bottom lines. Training and

Development, March:70-73.

NEWS BRIEFS. 2007. Worries about children’s after-school activities lower productivity of

working parents. Journal of Employee Assistance, 37(2):30.

NORDENMARK, M. 2002. Multiple social roles – a resource or a burden: Is it possible for

men and women to combine paid work with family life in a satisfactory way? Gender, Work

and Organisation, 9(2):125-145.

PROKOPENKO, J. 1992. Productivity management. Geneva: International Labour Office.

RITCHIE, S. & MARTIN, P. 1999. Motivation management. Brookfield, USA: Gower.

SIMPSON, B. & HASELAU, C. 2006. Empathy in the South African context: relevant or

redundant? The Social Work Practitioner-Researcher, 18(3):283-297.

SMANJAK, P. 2007. Four steps to reduce cost of absence. HR Future, Human Strategy for

Business, 07:21-22.

STRYDOM, H. & VENTER, L. 2002. Sampling and sampling methods. In: DE VOS, A.S.

(ed), STRYDOM, H., FOUCHÉ, C.B. & DELPORT, C.S.L. Research at grass roots: for the

social sciences and human services professions (2nd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

THOMPSON, C.A. 2005. Work-life: organisations in denial. Journal of Employee

Assistance, 35(2):7-9.

VOSLOO, S.E. 1999. Rolkonflik by die werkende moeder – ‘n geestesgesondheidsperspektief.

Pretoria: University of South Africa. (Unpublished DComm Thesis)

WENTLING, R.M. 1998. Work and family issues: their impact on women’s career

development. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 80:15-23.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-18

How to Cite

Riekert, L., & Taute, F. (2014). THE INFLUENCE OF FAMILY DYNAMICS ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF WORKING MOTHERS IN A MOTOR COMPANY IN SOUTH AFRICA. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.15270/45-4-192

Issue

Section

Articles