THE SHAKY HIGH MORAL GROUND OF POSTMODERNIST “ETHICS”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15270/42-3-294Abstract
Hölscher’s (2005) question, “Does postmodernism have a moral, ethical and values base?” appearsas something of a paradox. But, as she rightly recognises, she is not the first to ask the question. Inposing this question, Hölscher is merely following a long line of scholars, including Bauman,whose Postmodern Ethics (1993) form the theoretical backdrop to her discussion, and Foucault,whose ideas have been more influential than Bauman’s on social work thinking (Chambon, Irving& Epstein, 1999; Hugman, 2003, 2005). In the social sciences Bauman (1995), Benhabib (1992),Foucault (2000) and Young (1990) have grappled with the implications of postmodernism forethics and morality. In social work Atherton and Bollard (2003), Gray (1995), Hugman (2003,2005), Parton (1994) and Walker (2001), among others, have critically examined the ethicalimplications of the so-called “postmodern turn” in social work. In this paper the authors draw onthe work of Berman (2000) in trying to unravel the high moral ground of postmodernism; engagein a re-evaluation of the impact of key figures in modern Western philosophy such as Wittgensteinand, especially, Habermas; and consider the implications of their work for social workDownloads
References
AQUINAS, T. 1936. Summa theologica (tr L. Shapcote). London: Burns & Oates.
ARISTOTLE. 1985. Nicomachean ethics (tr T. Irwin). Indianapolis: Hackett.
ATHERTON, C.R. & BOLLARD, K.A. 2003. Postmodernism: A dangerous illusion.
International Social Work, 45(4):421-433.
BAUMAN, Z. 1993. Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
BAUMAN, Z. 1995. Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality. Oxford: Blackwell.
BENHABIB, S. 1992. Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in
contemporary ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BERMAN, M. 2000. Wandering God: A study in nomadic spirituality. New York: State
University of New York Press.
BERNSTEIN, R. 1995. Dictatorship of virtue. New York: Vintage Books.
CHAMBON, A., IRVING, A. & EPSTEIN, L. (eds) 1999. Reading Foucault for social workers.
New York: Columbia University Press.
DAVIS, D. 1996. The role of Dharma in the understanding of professional morality among Hindu
physicians in India. Monash Bioethics Review, 15(4):29-36.
DOUKAS, D. & BERG, J. 2001. The family covenant and genetic testing. American Journal of
Bioethics, 1(3):2-10.
DUFFY, B. 1987. The world as I found it. New York: Ticknor and Fields.
EISNER, E. 1979. The educational imagination. New York: Macmillan.
FERNÁNDEZ-ARMESTO, F. 2001. Civilizations. London: Pan Books.
FOUCAULT, M. 1974. The archaeology of knowledge (tr A. Smith). London: Tavistock.
FOUCAULT, M. 2000. Ethics: Subjectivity and truth – the essential works of Foucault 1954-
, Volume 1 (ed Paul Rabinow, tr Hurley, R. et al.). London: Penguin.
GRAY, M. 1993. The relationship between social work, ethics and politics. Durban: University
of KwaZulu-Natal. (Unpublished PhD thesis)
GRAY, M. 1995. The ethical implications of current theoretical developments in social work.
British Journal of Social Work, 25(1):55-70.
GRAY, M. 1996. Moral theory for social work. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 32(4):289-
HABERMAS, J. 1972. Knowledge and human interests (tr J. Shapiro). London: Heinemann.
HABERMAS, J. 1974. Theory and practice (tr J. Viertal). London: Heinemann.
HABERMAS, J. 1984. Theory of communicative action (vol 1). Boston: Beacon Press.
HABERMAS, J. 1985. The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
HABERMAS, J. 1987. Theory of communicative action (vol 2). Boston: Beacon Press.
HABERMAS, J. 1988. On the logic of the social sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
HABERMAS, J. 1994. The past as future. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
HÖLSCHER, D. 2005. A postmodern critique of the SACSSP’s Draft Code of Ethics, Social
Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 41(3):237-250.
HUGMAN, R. 2003. Professional values and ethics in social work: Reconsidering
postmodernism? British Journal of Social Work, 33(8):1025-1041.
HUGMAN, R. 2005. New approaches in ethics for the caring professions: Taking account of
change for caring professions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
HUSSERL, E. 1958. The idea of phenomenology (tr W. Alston & G. Nakhnikian). The Hague:
Nijhoff.
KALBIAN, A. & SHEPHERD, L. 2003. Narrative portrayals of genes and human flourishing.
American Journal of Bioethics, 3(4):15-22.
KANT. I. [1785] 1964. Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (tr H.J. Paton). London:
Routledge.
LOVAT, T. 2001. In defence of phenomenology. Religious Education, 96(4):564-571.
LOVAT, T. 2003. The contribution of proportionism to bioethical deliberation in a moderately
post-scientific age. Theology @ McAuley, 3. Available:
http://www.mcauley.acu.edu.au/theology/Issue3/index.html
LOVAT, T. 2004. Aristotelian ethics and Habermasian critical theory: A conjoined force for
proportionism in ethical discourse and Roman Catholic moral theology. Australian E-Journal of
Theology, 3. Available: http://dlibrary.acu.edu.au/research/theology/ejournal/aejt_3/Lovat.htm
LOVAT, T. 2006. Practical mysticism as authentic religiousness: A Bonhoeffer case study.
Australian E-Journal of Theology, 6. Available:
http://dlibrary.acu.edu.au/research/theology/ejournal/aejt_6/lovat.htm
MACKLIN, R. 1995. Cloning without prior approval: A response to recent disclosures of noncompliance.
Monash Bioethics Review, 14(2):63-66.
MAGNUSSON, R. 1996. Testing for HIV without specific consent: A short review. Monash
Bioethics Review, 15(4):2-8.
MILLER, F. & BRODY, H. 2002. What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical? American
Journal of Bioethics, 2(2):3-9.
MONK, R. 1990. Ludwig Wittgenstein. New York: Free Press.
NUSSBAUM, M. 2001. Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. New York:
Cambridge University press.
OUTHWAITE, W. 1994. Habermas: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
PARTON, N. 1994. “Problematics of government”, (post)modernity and social work. British
Journal of Social Work, 24(1):9-32.
RASMUSSEN, D. 1990. Reading Habermas. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
REAMER, F.G. 2001. The social work ethics audit: A risk management tool. Washington, DC:
NASW Press.
ROBERTSON, J. 2001. Preconception gender selection. American Journal of Bioethics, 1(1):2-
STRAWSON, P. F. 1974. Freedom and resentment and other essays. London: Methuen Co.
Ltd.
Walker, S. 2001. Tracing the contours of postmodernism. British Journal of Social Work,
(1):29-39.
WARNOCK, G.J. 1971. The object of morality. London: Methuen & Co.
WENDLER, D. & SHAH, S. 2003. Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial
research? American Journal of Bioethics, 3(4):1-8.
WILLIAMS, B. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana Press.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. 1958. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. 1969. On certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
YOUNG, I.M. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
ZOLOTH, L. 2002. Jordan’s banks: A view from the first years of human embryonic stem cell
research. American Journal of Bioethics, 2(1):3-11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, and with conferences.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-4.0
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Articles as a whole may not be re-published with another journal.
