• Mankwane Makofane Associate Professor, University of Limpopo, Turfloop, South Africa
  • Mel Gray Social Work, University of New Castle, New South Wales, Australia


Limpopo Province occupies 10% of South Africa’s land mass and has 11.9% of the population. It is one of the poorest of the nine provinces in South Africa, second to KwaZulu-Natal. It is predominantly rural in nature. According to the estimates based on the South Africa Survey (South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR), 2003-2004), its population is 5.5 million and almost 90% of residents live in rural areas with 60% (3.3 m) of the population living in poverty. The abject poverty that characterises many rural communities in Limpopo, as well as in the rest of South Africa, poses an enormous challenge to the developmental welfare system given its avowed mission to eradicate poverty. The government remains committed to improving the quality of life of South Africans through the initiation of poverty-alleviation projects, especially in rural communities. While rural development remains on the country’s agenda, accessing government funding for community development projects is complex, particularly to rural dwellers as a detailed business plan is required. Brown (1999:148) made a similar observation in Transkei (East Cape Province) and concluded that the “most backward and needy areas are less likely…to make a successful application.”


ARROSSI, S., BOMBAROLO, F., HARDOY, J., MITLIN, D., COSCIO, L.P. & SATTERTHWAITE, D. 1994. Funding community initiatives. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

BOTES, L. & VAN RENSBURG, D. 2000. Community participation in development: Nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Development Journal: An International Forum, 35(1):41-58.

BROWN, M.J. 1999. The plight of rural elderly in South Africa: A case for a community deve-lopment cadre? Community Development Journal: An International Forum, 34(2):143-150.

COLLINS, K. 1999. Participatory research: A primer. Johannesburg: Prentice Hall (Pty) Ltd.

DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE. 1997. Nonprofit Organisations Act, Act 71 of 1997. Government Gazette No. 18487. Pretoria: Government Printer.

GOODLAND, R. & LEDEC, G. 1987. Neoclassical economics and the principles of sustainable development. Ecological Model, 38(19).

LAWN, P.A. 2001. Toward sustainable development: An ecological economics approach. London: International Society for Ecological Economics.

LOMBARD, A. 1992. Community work and community development: Perspectives on social development. Pretoria: HAUM-Tertiary.

LOMBARD, A. & DU PREEZ, J. 2004. Challenges for building partnerships in social development. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 40(3):232-245.

LONG, C. 2001. Participation of the poor in development initiatives: Taking their rightful place. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

MAKOFANE, M.D.M. 1998. Belief systems as obstacle towards development of rural women and its implications for social work practice. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 2(34):230-235.

MAKOFANE, M.D.M. & NUNTSU, N.R.M. 2001. Community development projects: Leadership and power issues in a rural community. Paper presented at the Joint Universities Committee on Social Work Conference, University of Port Elizabeth, RSA.

MINISTRY FOR WELFARE AND POPULATION DEVELOPMENT. 1997. White Paper for Social Welfare. Government Gazette, Vol. 386. No. 18166. Pretoria: Government Printer.

NARAYAN, D. 1995. Designing community based development. Social Development Family of the World Bank: Washington, DC.

NEL, E. & BINNS, T. 2000. Rural self reliance strategies in South Africa: Community initiatives and external support in the former homelands. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(3):367-377.

SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF RACE RELATIONS. 2004. South Africa Survey 2003/2004. Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.

VAN ROOYEN, C.A.J. & GRAY, M.M.A. 1995. Participatory research: Compatibility to social work. Social Work Researcher/Practitioner, 8(2):3-8.

How to Cite
Makofane, M., & Gray, M. (2014). FACTORS HINDERING THE SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME OF RURAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.15270/43-3-269