PERSPECTIVES ON THE FACTORS INFLUENCING STUDENT SOCIAL WORKERS IN THE EXECUTION OF THEIR RESEARCH PROJECTS AT FOURTH LEVEL IN AN OPEN DISTANCE-LEARNING CONTEXT

Authors

  • Mankwane Makofane Department of Social Work, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15270/47-4-117

Abstract

The inability of the fourth-level student social workers to complete their research projects on time has a negative impact on the throughput of the Department of Social Work at UNISA and hampers the implementation of the recruitment and retention strategy of social workers initiated by the National Department of Social Development. With reference to the latter, Mr Mnguni, a policy developer in the Service Standards Directorate of the National Department of Social Development states that “The Recruitment and Retention Strategy for Social Workers has been adopted and implemented since 2004 by the Department of Social Development; it is now part of the bigger Human Resource Strategy in the department. The implementation of the following programmes bears reference to the implementation of the strategy: the regrading of social workers’ salaries in 2004, the Occupational Specific Dispensation (OSD) in 2010, the scholarship programme, career fairs and now the exchange programme with the United Kingdom. The department is now preparing for evaluation of the strategy.”

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADAM, N., ZOSKY, D.L. & UNRAU, Y.A. 2004. Improving the research climate in social work curricula: clarifying learning expectations across BSW and MSW research courses. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(3/4):1-18.

ALPASLAN, A.H. 2010. Social work research: a step-by-step guide on how to conduct your fourth-year research project and write the research report. Study guide for SCK410B. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

AMNON, L. 1991. Faculty, practitioner, and student attitudes towards research. Journal of Social Work Education, 27(1):34-40.

BLAKELY, T.J. 1992. A model for distance education delivery. Journal of Social Work Education, 28:214-221.

BLESS, C. & HIGSON-SMITH, C. 2000. Fundamentals of social research methods: an African perspective. Cape Town: Juta.

BOURN, D. & BOOTLE, K. 2005. Evaluation of a distance learning, post graduate advanced award in social work programme for child and family social work supervisors and mentors. Social Work Education, 24(3):343-362.

CAMERON, P.J. & ESTE, D.C. 2008. Engaging students in social work research education. Social Work Education, 27(4):390-406.

CRESWELL, J.W. 1994. Research design: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

CRESWELL, J.W. 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

DELPORT, C.S.L. & FOUCHÉ, C.B. 2005. The place of theory and literature review in the qualitative approach to research. In: DE VOS, A.S., STRYDOM, H., FOUCHÉ, C.B. & DELPORT, C.S.L. Research at grassroots – for the social sciences and human service professions (3rd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK, UNISA. 2008. Strategic Project Submission. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

DUNLAP, K.M. 1993. A history of research in social work education: 1915-1991. Journal of Social Work Education, 29(3):293-301.

FOSSEY, E., HARVEY, C., McDERMOTT, F. & DAVIDSON, L. 2002. Understanding and evaluating research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36:717-732.

GIBBS, A. & STIRLING, B. 2010. Reflections on designing and teaching a social work research course for distance and on-campus students. Social Work Education, 29(4):441-449.

HARDCASTLE, D.A. & BISMAN, C.D. 2003. Innovations in teaching social work research. Social Work Education, 22(1):31-43.

KREFTING, L. 1991. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3):215-222.

LEWIS, R. 1995. The creation of an open learning environment in HE, innovation and learning in education. The International Journal for the Reflective Practitioner, 1(2):32-36.

LEWIS, C. 2003. Preparing the next generation of researchers. Social Work Education, 22(1/2):213-225.

LUNDAHL, B.W. 2008. Teaching research methodology through active learning. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 28(1/2):273-288.

MNGUNI, S.J. 2010. Discussion held on 14 December with a policy developer in the Service Standards Directorate of the National Department of Social Development. Pretoria.

MONETTE, D.R., SULLIVAN, T.J. & DEJONG, C.R. 2008. Applied social research: a tool for the human services (8th ed). London: Thompson Brooks/Cole.

NEUMAN, W.L. 2006. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. New York: Allyn and Bacon.

O’CONNOR, D.L. & O’NEILL, B.J. 2004. Toward social justice: teaching qualitative research. Journal of Teaching Social Work, 24(3/4):19-33.

ROBLYER, M.D. & EKHAML, L. 2000. How interactive are your distance courses? A rubric for assessing interaction in distance learning. [Online] Available: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/roblyer32.html. SCHENK, C.J. 2009. The socio-economic realities of the Social Work students of the University of South Africa. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 45(3):299-313.

SCHENK, R. & GROBLER, H. 2009. Person-centred facilitation: process, theory and practice (3rd ed). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

SIEGAL, E., JENNINGS, J.G., CONKLIN, J. & NAPOLETANO-FLYNN, S. 1998. Distance learning in social work education: results and implications of a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(1):71-80.

STRYDOM, H. 1998. ’n Profiel van maatskaplike werkers en opleiding in navorsing. [A profile of social workers and training in research.] The Social Work Practitioner-Researcher/Die Maatskaplikewerk-Navorser-Praktisyn, 11(1):53-68.

STRYDOM, H. 2008. The social work research module(s) from a social welfare perspective. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 44(4):381-395.

TODD, M.J., SMITH, K. & BANNISTER, P. 2006. Supervising a social science undergraduate dissertation: staff experiences and perceptions. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2):161-173.

TUTTY, I.M., ROTHERY, M.A. & GRINNELL, R.M. 1996. Qualitative research for social workers: phases, steps and tasks. Boston, Mass: Allyn & Bacon.

UNISA – UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA. 2005. Strategic Plan 2015. Pretoria: University of South Africa production services.

UNISA – UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA. 2008. Open distance learning policy. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

UNISA – UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA. 2010a. Calendar – Subjects and Syllabuses (Part 2). Pretoria: University of South Africa Production Services: 138-140.

UNISA – UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA. 2010b. UNISA Examinations: Mark Composition Report for SCK 410B. Released on 02/12/2010.

UNISA – UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA. 2010c. UNISA Internal Student System Statistics.

UNRAU, Y.A. & GRINNELL, R.M. (Jr) 2005. The impact of social work research courses on research self-efficacy for social work students. Social Work Education, 24(6):639-651.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-12

How to Cite

Makofane, M. (2014). PERSPECTIVES ON THE FACTORS INFLUENCING STUDENT SOCIAL WORKERS IN THE EXECUTION OF THEIR RESEARCH PROJECTS AT FOURTH LEVEL IN AN OPEN DISTANCE-LEARNING CONTEXT. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.15270/47-4-117

Issue

Section

Articles