VIEWS OF SERVICE PROVIDERS ON SERVICES RENDERED TO PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND ON THE NEED FOR FAMILY PRESERVATION SERVICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15270/51-3-454Abstract
The article reflects the research findings of a study that was initiated because a welfare organisation delivering social work services to people with disabilities was investigating the possibility of developing a family preservation programme. The aim of the investigation was to explore the views of service providers on services delivered to persons with disabilities to determine the need for family preservation services. It was found that limited people power and funds placed serious constraints upon services. However, a clear link between the aims of family preservation and the needs of families caring for a relative with a disability has been established.Downloads
References
AL, C.M.W., STAMS, G.J.J.M., BEK, M.S., DAMEN, E.M., ASSCHER, J.J. & VAN DER LAAN, P.H. 2012. A meta-analysis of intensive family preservation programs: placement prevention and improvement of family functioning. Children and Youth Services Review, (2012). doi. 10.1016/childyouth.2012.04.002.
ARMSTRONG, C. & HILL, M. 2001. Support services for vulnerable families with young children. Child and Family Social Work, 6(4):351-358.
BROWN, J., COHEN, P., JOHNSON, J. & SALZINGER, S. 1998. A longitudinal analyses of risk factors for child maltreatment: findings of a 17 year prospective study of officially recorded and self-reported child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(11):1065-1078.
BROWN, M. & NEKU, R.J. 2005. A historical review of the South African social welfare system and social work practitioners’ views on its current status. International Social Work, 48(3):301-312.
CASH, S.J. & BERRY, M. 2003. The impact of family preservation services on child and family well-being. Journal of Social Service Research, 29(3):1-26.
CHAFFIN, M., BONNER, B.L. & HILL, R.F. 2001. Family preservation and family support programs: Child maltreatment outcomes across client risk levels and program types. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25(10):1269-1289.
CHITEREKA, C. 2014. People with disabilities and the role of social workers in Lesotho. Social Work and Society, 12(1). [Online] Available: http://www.socwork. net/sws/¬article/view/25/89.
COMMUNITY AGENCY FOR SOCIAL ENQUIRY (CASE). 1999. “We also count!” The extent of moderate and severe reported disability and the nature of the disability experience in South Africa. Report for South African Department of Health.
DE VOS, A.S., STRYDOM, H., FOUCHÉ, C.B. & DELPORT, C.S.L. 2011. Research at grass roots: for the social sciences and human service professions (4th ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN, CHILDREN, AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES & UNICEF. 2012. Children with Disabilities in South Africa: A Situation Analysis: 2001-2011. Pretoria.
EDWARDS, B., HIGGINS, V.M., GRAY, M., ZMIJEWSKI, N. & KINGSTON, M. 2008. The nature and impact of caring for family members with a disability in Australia. Australian Institute of Family Studies.
FOUCHÉ, C.B. & DE VOS, A.S. 2005. Quantitative research designs. In: DE VOS, A.S., STRYDOM, H., FOUCHÉ, C.B. & DELPORT, C.S.L. Research at grass roots: for the social sciences and human service professions (3rd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers, 132-143.
GATHIRAM, N. 2008: A critical review of the developmental approach to disability in South Africa. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17(2):146-155.
GIBBONS, J. & THORPE, S. 1989. Can voluntary support projects help vulnerable families? The work of Home-Start. British Journal of Social Work, 19:189-202.
GRAHAM, L., SELIPSKY, L., MOODLEY, J., MAINA, J. & ROWLAND, W. 2010. Understanding poverty and disability in Johannesburg. Centre for Social Development in Africa (CSDA) and Department for International Development United Kingdom (DFID).
JUBY, C. & RYCRAFT, J.R. 2004. Family preservation strategies for families in poverty. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 85(4):581-590.
LORENZO, T. & CRAMM, J.M. 2012. Access to livelihood assets among youth with and without disabilities in South Africa: Implications for health professional education. SAMJ, 102(6):568-881.
MAJA, P.A., MANN, W.M., SING, D., STEYN, A.J. & NAIDOO, P. 2011. Employing people with disabilities in South Africa. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41(1):24-33.
MALUCCIO, A.N., PINE, B.A. & TRACY, E.M. 2002. Social work practice with families and children. New York: Columbia University Press.
MARTENS, P. 2009. IFPS toolkit. National Family Preservation Network.
MULLINS, J.L., CHUENG, J.R. & LIETZ, C.A. 2011. Family preservation services: incorporating the voice of families into service implementation, Child and Family Social Work. doi. 10.111/j. 1365-2206.2011.00777.
OLDS, D. 2003. Reducing program attrition in home visiting: what do we need to know? Child Abuse and Neglect, 27(4):359-361.
PECORA, J., FRASER, M.W., NELSON, K.E., McCROSKEY, J. & MEEZAN, W. 1995. Evaluating family based services. New York: Hawthorne.
PHILLPOTT, S. & McLAREN, P. 2011. Hearing the voices of children and caregivers: situation analysis of children with disabilities in South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Social Development/ UNICEF.
PIERSON, J. 2002. Tackling social exclusion. London: Routledge.
PITHOUSE, A. & TASIRAN, A. 2000. Local authority family centre intervention: a statistical exploration of services as family support or family control. Child and Family Social Work, 5(4):129-141.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. 1997. South Africa: Integrated National Disability Strategy: White Paper.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. n.d. Western Cape Department of Social Development: Policy on Disability. [Online] Available: https://www.westerncape. gov.za/social.
RYAN, J.P. & SCHUERMAN, J.R. 2004. Matching families with specific family preservation services: a study of service effectiveness. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(4):347-472.
SIN, C.H., HEDGES, A., COOK, C., MGUNI, N. & COMBER, N. 2009. Disabled people’s experiences of targeted violence and hostility. Research Report 21. Manchester, England.
SOUTH AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION. 2006. The intersection of equality and disability in the work of the South African Human Rights Commission. Submission to Constitutional Review Committee.
STATISTICS SOUTH AFRICA. 2014. Census 2011. Profile of persons with disabilities in South Africa. Pretoria.
STREAK, J. & POGGENPOEL, S. 2005. Towards social welfare services for all vulnerable children in South Africa: a review of policy development, budgeting and service delivery. Children’s Budget Unit, Budget information Service, Idasa. 31 March 2005.
STRYDOM, H. 2005. Sampling and sampling methods. In: DE VOS, A.S., STRYDOM, H., FOUCHÉ, C.B. & DELPORT, C.S.L. Research at grass roots: for the social sciences and human service professions (3rd ed). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers, 192-204.
STRYDOM, M. 2008. Maatskaplike werkers by gesinsorgorganisasies se perspektief op gesinsinstandhoudingsdienste aan hoërisiko-gesinne. Stellenbosch: Universiteit van Stellenbosch. (DPhil proefskrif)
STRYDOM, M. 2010. The implementation of family preservation services: perspectives of social workers at NGOs. Maatskaplike Werk/Social Work, 46(2):192-208.
TRACY, E.M. 1995. Family preservation and home-based services. Encyclopedia of Social Work (19th ed). Washington: NASW Press, 973-981.
VISAGIE, S., SCHEFFLER, E. & SCHNEIDER, M. 2013. Policy implementation in wheelchair service delivery in a rural South African setting. African Journal of Disability, 2(1). [Online] Available: http://www.ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/ view/63/105.
WARREN-ADAMSON, C. 2006. Research review. Family centres: a review of the literature. Child and Family Social Work, 11(2):171-182.
WEYERS, M.L. & VAN DEN BERG, A.M. 2006. The success factors in community work services: a critical incident study. International Social Work, 49(2):177-187.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, and with conferences.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-4.0
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Articles as a whole may not be re-published with another journal.
