THE STATUS OF SOCIAL WORK AS PERCEIVED BY KEY HUMAN SERVICE PROFESSIONALS

Authors

  • Tanusha Raniga School of Social Work and Community Development, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
  • Madhu Kasiram School of Social Work and Community Development, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15270/46-3-157

Abstract

First-hand experience in various practice settings points to large-scale misunderstanding,ignorance and undervaluing of social work. In fact, it may be argued that the social worker isoften confused, lacks confidence and has a weak voice when compared to other professionals.Barter (cited in Shera, 2003:203) adds that the profession is indeed actively marginalised and islosing ground to nurses, health workers and occupational therapists. Dane and Simone (cited inDittrich, 1994:19) also mention this marginality and token status that is generally attributed tosocial workers in secondary settings such as hospitals, schools, legal aid offices, nursinghomes, business and industry. Their explanation for this perception is that, where socialworkers are few in number but their visibility high, this may lead to their decisions beingconstantly scrutinised, thereby undervaluing and undermining their worth. To add to thiscomplexity these writers introduce the dimension of gender into the undervaluing of theprofession, stating that social work may be “devalued as women’s work in such settings that arepredominantly male in inspiration” (Dittrich, 1994:20).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALLAN, J. 2003. Theorising critical social work. In: ALLAN, J., PEASE, B. & BRISKMAN,

L. (eds) Critical social work: an introduction to theories and practices. Sydney: Allen and

Unwin.

AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION. 1998. Judging the quality of a survey. Survey

Research Methods, Alexandria, USA. UNAUTHORED.

BABBIE, E.R. & MOUTON, J. 2001. The practice in social research. New York: Oxford

University Press.

BAINES, D. 2007. Anti-oppressive social work practice: fighting for space, fighting for

change, In: BAINES, D. (ed) Doing anti-oppressive practice: building transformative

politicized social work. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.

BERNSTEIN, A. & GRAY, M. 1997. Social work: a beginner’s text. South Africa: Juta and

Co.

BOGDAN, R.C. & BIKLEN, S.K. 1982. Qualitative research for education: an

introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc..

CHILD WELFARE SOUTH AFRICA. 2004. Executive summary: working conditions of

social workers employed by Child Welfare. Johannesburg: Child Welfare South Africa.

CREE, V.E. 2002. The changing nature of social work. In: ADAMS, R., DOMINELLI, L. &

PAYNE, M. (eds) Social work: themes, issues and critical debates (2nd ed). New York:

Palgrave MacMillan in association with The Open University.

DITTRICH, K.M. 1994. Integrating social welfare policy and social work practice. Pacific

Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.

DOMINELLI, L. 2002a. Anti-oppressive practice in context. In: ADAMS, R., DOMINELLI,

L. & PAYNE, M. (eds) Social work: themes, issues and critical debates (2nd ed). New York:

Palgrave MacMillan in association with The Open University.

DOMINELLI, L. 2002b. Anti-oppressive social work theory and practice. New York:

Palgrave MacMillan Publication.

DOMINELLI, L. 2004. Social work: theory and practice for a changing profession.

Cambridge: Polity Press.

GRAY, M. 1996. The role of social workers in developmental social welfare: is there a place

for them? Social Work Practice, (2):8-13.

HOLSCHER, D., KASIRAM, M. & SATHIPARSAD, R. 2009. “Deserving” children,

“undeserving” mothers? Multiple perspectives on the child support grant. Social

Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 45(1):11-27.

IFE, J. 2001. Human rights and social work: towards rights-based. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

JONES, C. 2001. Voices from the front line: state social workers and New labour. British

Journal of Social Work, 31(4):547-562.

KASIRAM, M. 2009. The emigration of South African social workers: using social work

education to address gaps in provision. Social Work Education: The International Journal,

-1227, 28(6):646-654.

MULLALY, B. 1997. Structural social work: ideology, theory and practices (2nd ed).

Toronto: Oxford University Press.

NAIDOO, S. & KASIRAM, M. 2003. Social work in South Africa: Quo Vadis? Social

Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 39(4):372-380.

POTGIETER, M.C. 1998. Social work process: development to empower people. South

Africa: Prentice Hall.

RANIGA, T. 2006. The implementation of the national life-skills and HIV/AIDS

programme and policy in the eThekwini region. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal.

(Unpublished PhD Thesis)

ROYCE, D. 2004. Research methods in social work (4th ed). USA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.

SHERA, W. 2003. Emerging perspectives on anti-oppressive practice. Toronto: Canadian

Scholars Press, Inc.

SEWPAUL, V. 2005. Structural social justice approach to family policy: critique of the Draft

South African Family Policy. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 41(4):310-322.

SEWPAUL, V. 2006. The global-local dialect: challenges for African scholarship and social

work in a post-colonial world. British Journal of Social Work, 36:419-434.

TERRE BLANCHE, M. & DURRHEIM, K. (eds) 1999. Research in practice: applied

methods for the social sciences. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-13

How to Cite

Raniga, T., & Kasiram, M. (2014). THE STATUS OF SOCIAL WORK AS PERCEIVED BY KEY HUMAN SERVICE PROFESSIONALS. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 46(3). https://doi.org/10.15270/46-3-157

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>